Suggestions Thread

[winner3]

Some of you may have noticed a survey I made a day or two ago. I put effort into making it and distributing it to garner responses from people on LAW. I found it to be much more useful than the site polls so I might do it again in the future. After 25 responses to the survey, here are the results to the question.



The numbers for this question are 12 for Heavy, 9 for indifferent, 4 for Light.




The numbers for this one are 16 to 9 in favor of the 24/7 title.

And finally



The numbers for this question are 12 indifferent, 8 for, and 5 against.



Based on this info, what I'd like to propose is the following:

• after we finish the middleweight tourney, we take on the task of introducing the heavyweight belt

• the next 'secondary' belt we introduce after the should be the 24/7, hardcore, LAWLESS, etc

• and finally, that we use the same system of qualifiers and tourneys for the introduction of the lightweight and heavyweight belts

What do you guys, think?

[RJD]

I think we should do it as you've said since the numbers support it. It would feel unfair not to do so.

Also I have two ideas that can be left it taken depending on if it's just more of my wacky ideas or if people like them.

With the lawless belt perhaps to actually formally have the belt in your accomplishments the wrestler needs to hold it for a whole day, which could result in people grabbing it and running off with it without even having a match, although the previous owner could totally chase them down to get it back.

Then the other idea is for the losers belt. Since this belt will for certain have an issue of repetition from many weak wrestler's holding it for a long time maybe enforce a rule that you only get there chances to get rid of the belt, and if you lose all three official belt matches you are marked as having held the loser belt and the officials take it and give it to another wrestler or book a new match to decide who holds it afterwards. I feel this would make it seem more critical for wrestler's to get rid of it if that Mark of shame doesn't fade and it could would stop stagnation from taking place. Also as an afterthought we could make some way to get the losers belt of your wrestler's records, perhaps if they beat the current holder of the belt at the time.

[winner3]

With the lawless belt perhaps to actually formally have the belt in your accomplishments the wrestler needs to hold it for a whole day, which could result in people grabbing it and running off with it without even having a match, although the previous owner could totally chase them down to get it back.

I like this idea. The issue arises in defining how long "a whole day" lasts. If we could reach a consensus on that, it'd be a chore to keep track of, but I don't mind trying.

Then the other idea is for the losers belt. Since this belt will for certain have an issue of repetition from many weak wrestler's holding it for a long time maybe enforce a rule that you only get there chances to get rid of the belt, and if you lose all three official belt matches you are marked as having held the loser belt and the officials take it and give it to another wrestler or book a new match to decide who holds it afterwards. I feel this would make it seem more critical for wrestler's to get rid of it if that Mark of shame doesn't fade and it could would stop stagnation from taking place. Also as an afterthought we could make some way to get the losers belt of your wrestler's records, perhaps if they beat the current holder of the belt at the time.

I like this idea for the most part. I'm skeptical about erasing title reigns from records. I plan to keep a timeline of all title exchanges and defenses. But some hard incentive not to keep the loser's belt for an extended period of time would be pretty awesome.

[winner3]

Attempting to revive this thread because I need suggestions. In the coming weeks, the Heavyweight Tourney should be ready to conclude with the finals and the lightweight qualifiers should finish up.

Who feels up to helping put together an event for the conclusion of the heavyweight tourney? Does anyone have ideas and would anyone like to participate?

[Highfly]

I am down to help in any way I can. Also was wondering what peoples thoughts of a mixed tag belt would be or a mix division belt?

[winner3]

I am down to help in any way I can. Also was wondering what peoples thoughts of a mixed tag belt would be or a mix division belt?

If people wanna get mixed going, we can start working on that.

[Caboose2.0]

Make mixed! We need more mixed (Official) competition! ^_^

[xalex]

i am looking forward to mixed too.... but didn´t we had a pool at the start of law about waiting with the mixed stuff until all titles are brought in?

[Fairy Dragon]

I'm not sure if that was a poll or not but I do agree we should probably get all the titles we have currently taken care of first and get a proper grip on divisions before we focus on mixed title stuff too much.

[winner3]

I'm happy to get mixed started after the lightweight championship if people want. I'm just trying to figure out the plan for putting something together for crowning a heavyweight and lightweight champion, the same way we did for the middleweight championship at our ppv.